(no subject)
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:15 pmI was looking at yesterday's Guardian. I *love* their reaction to the election: the G2's front cover is a completely black page with just the words "Oh, God." in the centre. (I'd've gone for 'oh, fuck' myself but I'm not sure they're allowed to print it.) I also love the journalist's comment about staying up "till 4:30 in the morning; long enough to cry like a girl."
Meanwhile, the Daily Mail smugly applauds Bush's wonderful victory for the 'moral majority' and manages to come out with the stupidest thing I've ever read in their paper, which is quite a feat:
"Not only would [gay marriage] undermine the institution of marriage itself, but it further called into question what it meant to be human."
Leaving aside the confusing mid-sentence change from future to past tense: what the hell does that even mean?
Meanwhile, the Daily Mail smugly applauds Bush's wonderful victory for the 'moral majority' and manages to come out with the stupidest thing I've ever read in their paper, which is quite a feat:
"Not only would [gay marriage] undermine the institution of marriage itself, but it further called into question what it meant to be human."
Leaving aside the confusing mid-sentence change from future to past tense: what the hell does that even mean?
no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:33 am (UTC)::pets your Nina icon::Man, I should update the Angel/Nina site. ::totally random::
no subject
on 2004-11-05 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:56 am (UTC)...So, what this person is trying to say is that being gay turns you into something not human, like howler monkeys?
God, some people should not have access to computers. They should just stay home and do the world a favor and put a plastic bag over their heads and breath in real, real deep.
no subject
on 2004-11-05 11:57 am (UTC)Also, I think the daily mail needs a beta reader, actually, it needs a herd of them.
no subject
on 2004-11-05 12:04 pm (UTC)Leaving aside the confusing mid-sentence change from future to past tense: what the hell does that even mean?
It means that they'd have to question their knee-jerk prejudices. It means that they'd have to re-examine their hate-filled stance that only people who Look Like Them are human beings.
no subject
on 2004-11-05 02:54 pm (UTC)I'm not even going to talk about the other paper, fascist rag that it is.
no subject
on 2004-11-05 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 03:51 pm (UTC)ScaremongerMail? This is the same paper that has had the headlines "Danger: Jam Sponge" and "Beware The Swan"? Yeah, I wouldn't pay attention to anything they have to say...no subject
on 2004-11-05 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 04:52 pm (UTC)(Though I must admit to loving the Mirror's How can 59,109,971 people be so dumb? headline).
no subject
on 2004-11-05 07:11 pm (UTC)And I prefer to look on the bright side. If I'm not human than maybe I'm homosuperior. I'm a mutant, dude. Watch me work my mad mutant skills and go.. make out with girls. Yay me!
no subject
on 2004-11-05 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-11-05 09:18 pm (UTC)*Further* called into question? We were already questioning what it meant to be human? I mean, apart from the usual philosophical musings?
no subject
on 2004-11-06 09:07 am (UTC)That quote is just disgusting.