(no subject)
Apr. 23rd, 2005 03:32 amThere's been discussion on
bookworm_jen's journal about canon and unconventional relationships. She proposed 4 rankings of relationships:
1) Canon: We saw an actual relationship on screen or there was a clear reference to a past relationship.
2) Near-Canon: We saw flirting or a one time fling on screen, or there was the implication of a past relationship. I would put relationships that are only refered to in commentary or interviews into this category.
3) Non-Canon: There was no relationship on screen, but there was a significant amount of sub-text or build-up and the writers could easily have worked it into the series without distorting the characters too badly.
4) Unconventional: There was no relationship, and it's highly unlikely that the writers could or would have worked it into the series without drastically changing who the characters are.
I'm interested in how subjective these are, or how much we agree on what counts as canon or almost-canon, so I present a poll. I randomly picked 15 m/f, m/m and f/f pairings, some of which happened on the show, some of which didn't. To play, pick which of the categories above you think each one falls into.
[Poll #480215]
[Poll #480216]
[Poll #480217]
1) Canon: We saw an actual relationship on screen or there was a clear reference to a past relationship.
2) Near-Canon: We saw flirting or a one time fling on screen, or there was the implication of a past relationship. I would put relationships that are only refered to in commentary or interviews into this category.
3) Non-Canon: There was no relationship on screen, but there was a significant amount of sub-text or build-up and the writers could easily have worked it into the series without distorting the characters too badly.
4) Unconventional: There was no relationship, and it's highly unlikely that the writers could or would have worked it into the series without drastically changing who the characters are.
I'm interested in how subjective these are, or how much we agree on what counts as canon or almost-canon, so I present a poll. I randomly picked 15 m/f, m/m and f/f pairings, some of which happened on the show, some of which didn't. To play, pick which of the categories above you think each one falls into.
[Poll #480215]
[Poll #480216]
[Poll #480217]
no subject
on 2005-04-23 04:06 am (UTC)Connor was only having a relationship with someone he called Cordelia.
no subject
on 2005-04-23 04:10 am (UTC)So... tough call.
no subject
on 2005-04-23 07:33 pm (UTC)The reunion with the real (although dead!) Cordy in "You're Welcome" also is hard evidence for a genuine canonical relationship between the real Cordy and Angel. Boy, I really do fall for the dumb ones.
no subject
on 2005-04-24 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
on 2005-04-23 07:59 pm (UTC)Doesn't this depend on when the possession fully occurred? He did meet Cordy at the end of s3, after all. If Jasmine's possession only took place after the events of "Spin the Bottle", Connor still has a memory of real!Cordy.
no subject
on 2005-04-23 08:54 pm (UTC)Obviously this is one that will never have a clear answer because of the way that ME needed to wank everything during the Jasmine arc to give it any of the crap CC performance any clarity; thus it's up to the individual to decide.