doyle: tardis (Default)
[personal profile] doyle
There's been discussion on [livejournal.com profile] bookworm_jen's journal about canon and unconventional relationships. She proposed 4 rankings of relationships:

1) Canon: We saw an actual relationship on screen or there was a clear reference to a past relationship.

2) Near-Canon: We saw flirting or a one time fling on screen, or there was the implication of a past relationship. I would put relationships that are only refered to in commentary or interviews into this category.

3) Non-Canon: There was no relationship on screen, but there was a significant amount of sub-text or build-up and the writers could easily have worked it into the series without distorting the characters too badly.

4) Unconventional: There was no relationship, and it's highly unlikely that the writers could or would have worked it into the series without drastically changing who the characters are.


I'm interested in how subjective these are, or how much we agree on what counts as canon or almost-canon, so I present a poll. I randomly picked 15 m/f, m/m and f/f pairings, some of which happened on the show, some of which didn't. To play, pick which of the categories above you think each one falls into.


[Poll #480215]


[Poll #480216]


[Poll #480217]

Re: I know they're awfully subjective...

on 2005-04-23 03:30 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] doyle_sb4.livejournal.com
I'm tabulating the results, which should give some kind of insight into what people see as canon, I hope... (one thing that really interests me is that I've previously seen people define relationships as being canon only if there's sex - which of course means Spike/Anya and Faith/Xander are canon but Angel/Cordelia, Cordelia/Xander and Xander/Willow aren't. Going by the results so far, it looks like that's not how most people see it, since at the moment C/X is the only ship to have 100% #1 votes)

Thanks for starting the discussion :)

Re: I know they're awfully subjective...

on 2005-04-23 03:41 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] justhuman.livejournal.com
I've always used the UCSL definition that the two people needed to consider themselves in a relationship for it to be "canon". So, Cordilia and Xander presented themselves as couple, arranged dates even when they were secret ones. Faith and Xander never did anything beyond having sex... well and attempted murder, but since it's Faith, that's kinda like sex too ;-)

For instance by the UCSL definition, Wes/Lilah was considered unconventional until Wesley said the "R" word.

Re: I know they're awfully subjective...

on 2005-04-23 04:09 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] fannishnej.livejournal.com
That's pretty much the definition of "relationship" that I was thinking of. I should probably add that to my original post so that people will have a clearer understanding of what I mean.

Profile

doyle: tardis (Default)
doyle

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 09:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios