Senator Sanctimonius
Apr. 23rd, 2003 11:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
doyleJust read the Senator Santorum interview.
*snerk* This guy's not for real, right? I love how in his mind consensual gay sex leads to polygamy and incest. Fun for all the family!
I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual.
I am beyond intrigued by this statement. What "acts outside traditional heterosexual relationships"? Are we talking kinkiness and S&M, or just anything outside intermarital missionary position, strictly for the making of the babies? Is it laid down somewhere what a traditional heterosexual relationship consists of? An amendment to the constitution, maybe? God knows, I'd hate to buck tradition...
I think this guy needs to write a book to make his position clearer. The Joyless Sex, maybe.
*snerk* This guy's not for real, right? I love how in his mind consensual gay sex leads to polygamy and incest. Fun for all the family!
I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual.
I am beyond intrigued by this statement. What "acts outside traditional heterosexual relationships"? Are we talking kinkiness and S&M, or just anything outside intermarital missionary position, strictly for the making of the babies? Is it laid down somewhere what a traditional heterosexual relationship consists of? An amendment to the constitution, maybe? God knows, I'd hate to buck tradition...
I think this guy needs to write a book to make his position clearer. The Joyless Sex, maybe.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
on 2003-04-23 05:06 pm (UTC)*snicker*
I bet...
on 2003-04-23 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2003-04-23 08:35 pm (UTC)::boggle::
And the Logic-Defying Statement of the Day Award goes to...
Ha, very funny.
on 2003-04-23 08:52 pm (UTC)Have no problem with with the colour blue, only for the colour blue being a colour of blue. If the colour blue repaints itself, Senator Contradictions will have no problem with it, because Senator Contradictions have no problem with the colour blue, only for it being a colour of blue.
Thank you.
no subject
on 2003-04-23 10:38 pm (UTC)Back to the topic at hand...or in hand...or *smacks self*
People are dumb.
no subject
on 2003-04-24 09:37 am (UTC)Mer